Skip to content
acharge by acemo

Load management without vendor lock-in

Your charge points. Your vendors. Your load management.

The limit is the building's connection, not the charge point — and not the brand on the wallbox. How your aCharge controller turns whatever power is actually spare into as many charging sessions as possible: vendor-independent, without tripping the fuse and without a grid upgrade.

“Two makes in one car park — and one system's load management cannot see the other's charge points.”

That is the normal case as soon as a site is extended: the existing wallboxes come from one manufacturer, the new ones from another, and the two systems regulate past each other. Staying vendor-locked at that point means either replacing half the installation or sizing it for the worst case all over again.

Do the maths for the worst case once

Six 11 kW wallboxes together want 66 kW. A typical 63 A house connection provides around 43 kW — and the building itself already takes a share of that. Without control, the installation has to be sized for the worst case: every charge point at full power simultaneously.

That leaves two options: an expensive grid upgrade, or fewer charge points. Dynamic load management is the third.

Example site

Charge points
6 × 11 kW
Theoretical demand
66 kW
House connection
63 A ≈ 43 kW
Shortfall
−23 kW

Those 23 kW are exactly the difference between “not possible” and “possible, with control”.

Fundamentals

What is dynamic load management?

Every building has one hard ceiling: its grid connection. Put together, charge points almost always want more than that ceiling allows. Dynamic load management solves this with metering and software instead of an expensive grid upgrade — it measures what the site actually draws, works out how much capacity is left, and hands that out to the vehicles. Second by second, all day long.

Six charge points want
66 kW
The connection delivers
43 kW
Below this current no car charges
6 A
01 · The problem

The cable is the bottleneck

A typical 63 A commercial connection delivers around 43 kW. Six 11 kW wallboxes want 66 kW — more than the connection can give. Without control the main fuse trips, or a grid upgrade runs into five figures.

02 · The naive fix

Static: safe, but wasteful

Static load management reserves a fixed budget for the charge points — sized against the building's peak load so it is safe at every hour. It works, but in the evening, when the building draws almost nothing, 30 kW sit unused in the cable.

03 · The answer

Dynamic: the leftovers, in real time

The controller measures the real draw at the building's supply point and releases exactly what is spare to the charge points. When the building load rises, the vehicles throttle back. When it falls, they charge faster. The connection limit is never exceeded — and never needlessly left unused.

Interactive simulation

One day at an example site

6 charge points at 11 kW each on a 43 kW connection. Switch the strategy and watch what happens to the site.

Building load Charging power PV generation Grid draw Grid connection 43 kW Available power (grid + PV)
00:00

At the connection now

Building
0 kW
PV
0 kW
Charging
0 kW
Grid draw
0 / 43 kW
Spare
0 kW

Van · deliveries

06:00 – 14:00 · 75 kWh

0 %

Company car · field sales

07:00 – 17:30 · 60 kWh

0 %

Employee A

08:00 – 17:00 · 52 kWh

0 %

Employee B

08:30 – 16:00 · 40 kWh

0 %

Visitor

10:00 – 12:30 · 58 kWh

0 %

Pool vehicle · late shift

16:00 – 21:00 · 80 kWh

0 %
End-of-day results for the three control strategies
Strategy Delivered Avg. state of charge on departure Vehicles ≥ 80 % Peak grid draw Over the limit
No control kWh
Static kWh
Dynamic (DYLAMO) kWh

Simplified simulation using example values: 63 A connection (≈ 43 kW), six 11 kW charge points, a typical commercial load profile and six vehicles with different dwell times. Real sites are dimensioned individually.

Under the hood

Four steps, every second

01

Measure

A meter at the building's supply point reports actual real power — per phase, continuously. Not the number on the datasheet, but what is genuinely flowing right now.

02

Compute

The controller subtracts that from the contracted connection capacity. Whatever is left is the free budget — plus whatever the PV system is generating on site.

03

Distribute

The budget is split across the occupied charge points — by priority, dwell time and state of charge. Never below 6 A per vehicle, because below that no car charges at all.

04

Fail safe

The controller regulates locally, not in the cloud. If the internet connection drops, load management carries on unchanged and re-syncs automatically once it returns.

DYLAMO tier

When one dimension is no longer enough

Simple dynamic load management tracks one quantity: the spare capacity at the connection. At larger sites, though, other loads and generators hang off the same cable — and they move that budget constantly. DYLAMO factors all of them in rather than ignoring them.

  • On-site PV generation
  • Heat pumps
  • Transformer load
  • Charge points from multiple vendors
  • Priority and dwell time per vehicle
  • Vehicle battery state of charge
§ 14a EnWG

When the grid operator throttles

Since 2024, German grid operators may temporarily throttle controllable consumers — wallboxes, heat pumps, batteries — down to 4.2 kW when the grid is at risk of overload, in exchange for reduced grid fees. The aCharge Controller accepts that signal and still allocates even the reduced budget by priority, rather than hard-stopping charge points.

Try the “Grid operator dimming” switch in the simulation above — it throttles the evening peak from 17:00 to 20:00.

What this means in practice

More charge points on the same connection

The economic core of dynamic load management is not the technology but what it avoids: a bigger grid connection. Instead of sizing the cable for a theoretical worst case where everything runs at once, the existing connection is used as far as it safely allows — and the site can grow without the excavators coming back.

Modbus TCP EEBus Potential-free contacts EnWG § 14a VDE-AR-N 4100 Metrology-compliant Vendor-independent Offline-capable Modbus TCP EEBus Potential-free contacts EnWG § 14a VDE-AR-N 4100 Metrology-compliant Vendor-independent Offline-capable

In your installation

What your aCharge controller makes of it

The simulation shows the principle. On a real site three things come on top — the difference between a control loop and an operation.

It keeps running when the line drops

The controller regulates locally. If the internet connection fails, it keeps enforcing the site capacity unchanged and re-synchronises with the cloud afterwards — sessions and meter readings are not lost.

It does not matter who built the wallbox

Charge points are connected over OCPP or Modbus TCP — mixed within the same installation if need be. You are not tied to one vendor and can add whatever is available later.

The grid operator gets a say

On a § 14a EnWG control signal the controller reduces power to the permitted level instead of switching off. Every event is logged and stays auditable.

Technical

What can be connected

Charge points, generators and loads in one budget — regardless of who built them.

Charge point protocol
OCPP 1.6 · 1.6 Security · 2.0.1
Fieldbus
Modbus TCP
Vendors
mixed vendors in one installation
Charging hardware
AC and DC
Control
local on the controller, works offline
Power control
dynamic, multi-dimensional
§ 14a EnWG
grid-serving control instead of shut-off
PV system
surplus charging
Heat pump
included as a controllable load
Transformer
included as a measuring point
Grid connection
limit enforced in real time
Scale
up to 1,000 charge points per site

Frequently asked

Dynamic load management for charging infrastructure

What is the difference between static and dynamic load management?
Static load management splits a fixed budget by a fixed key and ignores what the building is drawing. Dynamic load management measures continuously at the grid connection and distributes exactly the power that is spare at that moment — which means more usable charge points on the same connection.
Does load management work with wallboxes from different vendors?
Yes. Charge points connect over OCPP or Modbus TCP, mixed within the same installation. This is exactly where vendor-locked systems fail: they cannot see the other make's charge points and regulate past each other. An aCharge controller manages every connected point in one shared budget, so extending a site does not mean replacing the system.
From how many charge points is dynamic load management worth it?
As soon as the sum of the connected loads exceeds what the grid connection has spare. With 11 kW wallboxes on a 63 A connection that is typically from the fourth charge point onwards. Below that, a controller has nothing to allocate.
What does § 14a EnWG change for my charging infrastructure?
Controllable consumption devices — charge points among them — must be able to reduce power on a signal from the grid operator. An aCharge controller lowers site power to the permitted level instead of switching off, and logs every intervention auditably.
What does dynamic load management cost compared with a grid upgrade?
A controller costs a fraction of extending the grid connection and needs neither an approval process nor civil works. Extending the connection is the investment that dynamic load management avoids, or at least defers, in most installations.