Skip to content
acharge by acemo
← Products

Product comparison

TELECONTROL or DYLAMO?

The same hardware, two licence tiers — plus the cloud, which is independent of both. Three questions almost always decide it.

The short answer

You need DYLAMO if any of these is true

1

OCPP charge points — or a model not yet implemented

TELECONTROL speaks Modbus TCP and the models already implemented; different makes side by side are fine.

2

More than one measuring point

Per building section, feeder or transformer, say.

3

PV, heat pump or transformer must be in the loop

That is where load management becomes energy management.

If none applies, aCharge TELECONTROL is enough — and costs less. aCharge Cloud is independent of both: it comes in as soon as you need access control, tariffs or billing.

Row by row

Every difference

Feature comparison of aCharge TELECONTROL, aCharge DYLAMO and aCharge Cloud
Capability TELECONTROL DYLAMO CLOUD
Where it runs On site On site In the cloud
Dynamic load management Single-stage Multidimensional Not applicable
Charge point protocols Modbus TCP OCPP + Modbus TCP OCPP 1.6 / 1.6-Sec / 2.0.1
Mixed vendors yes, implemented models Yes Yes
Meters 1 several Not applicable
PV, heat pump, transformer No Yes Not applicable
Charge points per site up to 100 up to 1,000 hundreds of thousands
Runs without internet Yes Yes No
§ 14a EnWG Yes Yes Not applicable
Metrology-compliant billing No Yes Yes
Access, RFID, user management No Yes Yes
Tariffs and vouchers No No Yes
Ad-hoc charging by QR code No No Yes
Roaming (Hubject, OCPI) No No Yes
Own branding (white-label) No No Yes

“—” means: not part of this product's job. Controllers regulate; the cloud manages and bills.