Product comparison
TELECONTROL or DYLAMO?
The same hardware, two licence tiers — plus the cloud, which is independent of both. Three questions almost always decide it.
The short answer
You need DYLAMO if any of these is true
OCPP charge points — or a model not yet implemented
TELECONTROL speaks Modbus TCP and the models already implemented; different makes side by side are fine.
More than one measuring point
Per building section, feeder or transformer, say.
PV, heat pump or transformer must be in the loop
That is where load management becomes energy management.
If none applies, aCharge TELECONTROL is enough — and costs less. aCharge Cloud is independent of both: it comes in as soon as you need access control, tariffs or billing.
Row by row
Every difference
| Capability | TELECONTROL | DYLAMO | CLOUD |
|---|---|---|---|
| Where it runs | On site | On site | In the cloud |
| Dynamic load management | Single-stage | Multidimensional | —Not applicable |
| Charge point protocols | Modbus TCP | OCPP + Modbus TCP | OCPP 1.6 / 1.6-Sec / 2.0.1 |
| Mixed vendors | yes, implemented models | Yes | Yes |
| Meters | 1 | several | —Not applicable |
| PV, heat pump, transformer | No | Yes | —Not applicable |
| Charge points per site | up to 100 | up to 1,000 | hundreds of thousands |
| Runs without internet | Yes | Yes | No |
| § 14a EnWG | Yes | Yes | —Not applicable |
| Metrology-compliant billing | No | Yes | Yes |
| Access, RFID, user management | No | Yes | Yes |
| Tariffs and vouchers | No | No | Yes |
| Ad-hoc charging by QR code | No | No | Yes |
| Roaming (Hubject, OCPI) | No | No | Yes |
| Own branding (white-label) | No | No | Yes |
“—” means: not part of this product's job. Controllers regulate; the cloud manages and bills.